The murder trial of Stephen McCullagh, accused of killing his pregnant partner Natalie McNally, has taken a dramatic turn after the defense revealed it received new evidence late last week — evidence serious enough that Belfast Crown Court immediately adjourned the proceedings. The unexpected delay has stirred renewed interest in a case already marked by emotional devastation, high-stakes forensic questions, and deep public outrage across Northern Ireland.

TIMELINE: The Murder of Natalie McNally

December 18, 2022 – The Crime
• Natalie McNally, 32, is stabbed to death inside her Silverwood Green home in Lurgan.
• She is 15 weeks pregnant with her unborn son.
• Family members later describe the scene as “every parent’s worst nightmare.”

December 19–20, 2022 – Shock and First Statements
• Police confirm a violent death and open a criminal investigation.
• Early communication suggests investigators are confident it was not a random attack.

Early 2023 – Focus on McCullagh
• Attention turns toward Natalie’s partner, Stephen McCullagh, 35, of Woodland Gardens, Lisburn.
• He is questioned, later charged, and ultimately accused of murdering Natalie on the night of December 18.

2023–2024 – Pre-Trial Battles
• Defense and prosecution clash over digital forensics, timeline reconstruction, and motive.
• Northern Ireland follows the case closely as community vigils continue in Natalie’s memory.

November 2025 – Trial Date Arrives… and Breaks Open
• McCullagh arrives in Belfast Crown Court ready to face the jury.
• Then everything changes.
• The defense announces receipt of new evidence the week prior — material they say needs “significant time” to review.
• Judge grants a delay.
• Trial reset for Wednesday.

WHAT WE KNOW: Evidence Presented So Far

THE FACTS (Confirmed Through Court & Police Statements)

✔ Cause of Death: Multiple stab wounds.
✔ Location: Natalie’s home in Silverwood Green.
✔ Pregnancy: 15 weeks — a critical factor elevating the emotional and legal gravity of the case.
✔ Primary Accused: Her partner, Stephen McCullagh.
✔ McCullagh’s Plea: Not guilty.
✔ New Evidence: Confirmed. Type undisclosed. Defense argues it is “significant.”
✔ Family Presence: Natalie’s relatives were physically in the courtroom during the announcement.

RUMORS (Unconfirmed, Circulating Publicly)

Allegations of digital trail inconsistencies.
Claims McCullagh may have attempted to construct an alibi via livestream recording.
Speculation about deleted messages or devices being re-analyzed.

None of these are currently confirmed by the court.
They should be treated as public chatter, not verified case facts.

SPECULATION (What Analysts Are Whispering About)

Some legal commentators suggest the new evidence may involve:
• forensic review updates,
• phone or CCTV data,
• or possible third-party involvement.
Others question whether the defense is preparing a dramatic alternative suspect theory.

Again: these are theories — not verified evidence.

THE HUMAN IMPACT: A FAMILY IN AGONY

Natalie wasn’t just a victim — she was a daughter, a sister, a beloved friend, and an expectant mother whose unborn son was also lost that night.
Her family’s presence in the courtroom underscores the rawness of their pain. Every delay, every twist, every legal curveball forces them to relive the worst night of their lives.

The McNally family continues to demand:
“Truth. Justice. Accountability.”

Their public statements have remained graceful but firm — a plea for closure in a case that refuses to stop reopening emotional wounds.

WHY THIS TRIAL MATTERS

This is not just another high-profile murder case.
It is:
• a domestic violence tragedy,
• a case involving an unborn child,
• a rare Northern Ireland courtroom drama now gaining international attention.

“New evidence” is a phrase that changes everything — strategy, timeline, and public expectations. When a trial pauses at the finish line, it almost always means something big is coming.

RealCrimeNetwork.com readers know:
This case isn’t slowing down.
It’s heating up.

YOUR TURN: What Do YOU Think Happened?

The delay raises questions — big ones.
Do you believe the new evidence helps the defense…
or signals a deeper twist still to come?

Drop your thoughts in the comments.
Your theories may be featured in our next case update.

---

Affiliate Disclosure:
Some links in my articles may bring me a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support of my work here!

Veterans Day Sale! – EMP Shield’s family of products are designed to protect against electromagnetic pulse (EMP), lightning, power surges, and coronal mass ejection (CME)